hey prevtec ive just boughtn a prelude.....for my retiree employee to del newspapers,only joshin bud
Hehehehe I like ......
hey prevtec ive just boughtn a prelude.....for my retiree employee to del newspapers,only joshin bud
ha hahey prevtec ive just boughtn a prelude.....for my retiree employee to del newspapers,only joshin bud
yes i know what you meant,I think you misunderstood me mate. I meant that they are not special enough to be a supercar.
yes i know what you meant,
its like this, if you had 100,000 grand, would you buy an nsx??
i wouldnt, you could get a porsche turbo for that money
plus they wont break down the way a true supercar would
and because of this there not a supercar
the nsx is classed as a supercar,and because of this there not a supercar
the nsx is classed as a supercar,
now i didnt class it as 1, and in my eyes their not a supercar, just the fastest honda you can buy
but some fella in the motoring industry classed the nsx as a supercar
and its why i said if you want a reliable supercar, well its honda
and if i paid all that money on a supercar, i wouldnt want it to break down
its why i said the nsx
what supercar would you buy??
if i was buying a supercar, id want it to be specialThats my point exactly. I feel the same about the R8. I just wouldn't part with that money for an Audi.....
i love honda, but i agree with you, i wouldnt buy 1 either, theres way more fun to be had with 100,000 poundIt wouldn't be a Honda thats for sure
hey well said tb...i would not spend 100k on an audi either,yes reliable but its just not "right" money no object i would have a collection of classic supercars,i think they are the true supercars as at the time they were groundbreaking,unlike todays
heres 1 for you, youd like an american car with a huge engine, but thats a muscle caralso the cost, supercars normaly cost a bomb the £70k ish price for an NSX also made it rather cheaper.
what supercar would i buy ? mmm going to have to thing about that, would have said cobra but methinks it would most likely be classed as muscle - late 60s car with a big engine
yes there is, thats because the origanal gt40 was made in the 60s, so it always had the muscle bread, the new 1 is a supercar as it handles, thats a good point chrisgood answer pt...they i think are more supercar than muscle car simply because they actually handle,but yes there is the old muscle bit in there
it is, did i hear top gear saying it was a third the price as a ferrari?and not a bad price too
there we go, its why i wouldnt pat 100k for a nsx or an audi,think it was around 120k
there we go, its why i wouldnt pat 100k for a nsx or an audi,
20k extra and a load of new underwear and bobs your uncle
worse than the other 2 i know, but a lot of bang for your buckBut its a ford
Thing is, most supercars don't get driven enough to have a chance to be unreliable.
Thread starter | Title | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
What is your favourite supercar maker | Supercars | 1 | ||
R | Buying a supercar on concept only? | Supercars | 9 | |
What is a supercar | Supercars | 67 | ||
Ideas wanted for the best supercar to live with | Supercars | 34 |